|
KMID : 0387319980080010155
|
|
Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration
1998 Volume.8 No. 1 p.155 ~ p.182
|
|
|
Current Status of MRI Distribution, Prevailing Charges and Analysis of Its Performance
|
|
Moon Ok-Ryun
Jhang Won-Gi
Lee Sang-Yi
Kim Cheol-Woong
Choi Kyung-Hye
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
There exists a remarkable differences in use of MRI scanning among income classes. The poor can hardly utilize it. This is because, among high cost technologies, MRI is the only equipment not covered under health insurance benefits in Korea. This study was designed 1) to reveal the status of nation-wide MRI installation, customary charges and per unit annual scanning performance, and 2) to analyse factors influencing the above variables. The data for this study came from ´MRI Prevalence Survey" conducted by the National Federation of Medical Insurance(NFMI) in 1997, and were analyzed through SAS packages for T-test, analysis of variance and stepwise multiple regression. Data were collected from 188 hospitals equipped with MRI scanners.
Major findings are summarized as follows :
The number of MRI scanners has increased from 69 in 1994 to 158 in 1996(2.3 times), while per unit annual scanning performance has risen by 11.2% from 2,173 cases in 1994 to 2,417 cases in 1996. Such a rapid increase was made possible mainly due to the inclusion of CT scanning under the health insurance benefit package. The customary charges for MRI scanning with or without contrast media, on average, amounted to 484,000 Won and 402,000 Won, respectively, with the percentile increase of 17.8% and 8.1% each during the same time. Korea ranks the third worldwidely in terms of number of MRI installations, 4.8 scanners per one million persons, only next to Japan and United States.
Geographical variation of MRI, however, was rather high, 7.91 unit, in Cheju area compared to 1.82 in Kyongnam area. Variations of customary charge of MRI scanning can be explained as much as by 44.8% by both the total amount of claims to NFMI and geographical variable. The charges were more likely to be higher in metropolitan areas like Seoul and in hospitals with a bigger amount of claims. While those of per unit annual scanning performance can be explained as much as by 30.7% by both MRI installation cost and level of MRI-installed organizations.
Per capita scanning performance was higher in tertiary hospitals and hospitals equipped with more expensive scanners. Two measures are called for to remedying the existing excessive abundance in MRI units in an area like a province or a metropolitan district. The other is to establish a committee on introduction of high cost technologies for reviewing its effective use.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
MRI, Customary charge, Distribution, Per unit annual scanning performance
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
 
|
|